Why outside the box?

“Maybe I’m crazy.”

I said these words recently to a colleague as we discussed one of my far-fetched but potentially impactful ideas for transforming the American education system.

She laughed and replied, “You’re definitely crazy.”

“Well,” I responded, “I may be crazy, but I’m right.” She laughed harder.

I spend a lot of time thinking about systemic change. How should the world be different? How could we make it dramatically better, make things more efficient and effective? I’m honestly not sure why I do this or where the ideas come from. There are a few lines from the character Morpheus in the film “The Matrix” that describe how I feel:

“Let me tell you why you’re here. You’re here because you know something. What you know you can’t explain, but you feel it. You’ve felt it your entire life, that there’s something wrong with the world. You don’t know what it is, but it’s there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad.”

Matrix_reflection

I feel that splinter in my mind, and it drives me to think about how to make things better through systemic change. I don’t know why, it’s just the way my mind works, always has been.

Over the last few years I’ve brainstormed and refined dozens of ideas for systemic change, on topics that range from trivial to transformational, and implications that vary from modest to nearly inconceivable. I think some of these changes are actually quite possible in the next few years, while others are more likely to be considered far in the future, if at all.

My brilliant and sometimes patient wife Sabrina has had the rather unfortunate task of listening to these ideas as I’ve developed and refined them. Often she (rightly) rolls her eyes when I start to talk with a friend about the absolute logic of switching our default keyboards to the DVORAK format, and has a similar reaction about my other suggestions as well. But she humors me.  🙂

She has also watched me grapple with the question of what, if anything, to do with these ideas. A few years ago I thought I might someday write about them and would call them “Ideas for America in the 21st century.” But as I look at history for examples of major social and systemic changes, I think maybe I’m wrong. A better title might be “Ideas for America in the 22nd century.” Today we believe that of course women should vote and that an African-American man can be President. But 100 years ago many people thought those were crazy ideas. Maybe my ideas aren’t crazy, they just need more time to ripen.

While playing 18 holes recently with a group of friends I shared with them my idea for a new golf scoring system. Overall they liked it and thought it was interesting. Then one of them said, “Didn’t you write a novel a few years ago? You should write this idea down, too, and share it with people.” They seemed genuinely interested. So I thought I’d give it a shot.

I don’t know if any of my ideas will lead to change, but I think it’s possible. So I want to share them. Some of them  are just for fun—how can we make soccer more entertaining to watch, or how should we modify the playoff system for college football? Some are about the future of America—what are the likely scenarios for the country over the next few decades, or how should we change the structure of the federal budget? And some are even more transformational and fundamental—how should we redesign the system of states in the U.S., or should we be worrying about a new secession movement in America and even Civil War II?

Am I crazy? Probably at least a little bit. But am I right? Are any of these ideas helpful? I’ll let you decide. When I collaborate in problem solving with colleagues at work I often say my goal is not to be right, but to be clear in order to help push the thinking forward. Maybe some of these ideas can help us think about things more clearly or with new perspectives, and perhaps we can find ways to make the world a better place. I look forward to exploring them with you if you’re interested.

Enjoy!

Click to see proposal summaries.

8 responses

  1. Nice thinking! One I often wonder about is how great it would be if benchmarking worked on big things like healthcare. Singapore… Copy that! Thanks Scott!

    • I agree. I’m thinking more broadly about how to bring “system-level” metrics into the American policy discussion more effectively. How can we more clearly describe the current status of America’s “performance” on key metrics for health care, education, energy, defense spending, etc. in ways that will help raise the awareness of voters and lead to change? Stay tuned–I want to put together a “metrics package” for the US and see what it might look like, and add the international comparisons.

    • Great! Looking forward to digging in to some of these topics and seeing if we can all learn more about the issues, the various points of view, and how we might move things forward.

  2. Curious to hear your thoughts on how to correct the imbalance in how much we invest in the elderly vs. how much we invest in children. Seems like the closer we get to end of someone’s life, the more money we spend. That doesn’t make sense. But babies don’t vote. How do we fix this? Discuss…

    • Great point. I think the proposal about proxy voting for children or something like it is a step in the right direction.

      http://thinkingwayoutsidethebox.org/?page_id=125)

      We need to be sure the interests of children are increasingly represented as part of the democratic process.

      But I think the broader point is that we need to address foundational issues like:
      1. Are we as a society willing to provide health care for citizens of any age regardless of the cost? What if an elderly citizen needs expensive health care but they don’t have sufficient funds, are we as a society willing to pay any amount, regardless? Same question for a child or newborn–are there limits to what we should do?

      2. How do we think about the value of prevention vs. treatment (or caring more for the young vs. meeting the health needs of our older citizens)? Should we be making investments that increase aggregate well-being and reduce costs? Is it “ok” to think this way?

      In the coming weeks or months I will be adding a section called “Tough topics” that will include some rather radical and touchy proposals to address these kinds of issues and push the envelope. But this definitely drifts into some core questions about life, death, fundamental human rights, the role of society, etc. Important stuff!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *